Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aditya Gadhvi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aditya Gadhvi[edit]

Aditya Gadhvi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated by 2402:8100:39a4:e52a:9e9a:6ad7:51ec:7ec8. Copied from talkpage: Nominated AfD for: Not notable enough to have a separate Wiki article. Also this is created by a user who is accused by the editors for the conflict of interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:8100:39A4:E52A:9E9A:6AD7:51EC:7EC8 (talk) 06:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC) Yunshui  09:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:43, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:44, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:46, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable enough by reliable sources. Created by the banned user who has already admitted to paid editing.Coderzombie (talk) 09:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete sunject fails WP:GNG, and WP:NCREATIVE as well. He hasnt won any notable award, and doesnt have significant coverage. article of non notable person, whose creator, Sunilbutolia, is now blocked for WP:UPE. —usernamekiran (talk) 23:16, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Coderzombie: Banned, and blocked are different on wikipedia :) —usernamekiran (talk) 23:16, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.